The Eagles vs Vikings player stats are two NFC teams with passionate fan bases, talented offensive players, and defenses capable of changing a game in a single play. Their meetings attract attention from NFL fans who want to understand quarterback performance, receiving production, rushing efficiency, defensive takeaways, and the key moments that decide the final score.
The Eagles vs Vikings matchup played on October 19, 2025, at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis delivered an entertaining contest. Philadelphia defeated Minnesota 28–22, combining an outstanding passing performance from Jalen Hurts with a defensive touchdown that helped create an important lead. Minnesota gained more total yards and recorded more first downs, but turnovers and limited touchdown production made the difference.
Hurts completed 19 of 23 passes for 326 yards and three touchdowns. DeVonta Smith recorded 183 receiving yards, while A.J. Brown added 121 yards and two touchdown catches. For Minnesota, Carson Wentz threw for 313 yards but was intercepted twice. Jordan Addison led the Vikings with 128 receiving yards, and Jordan Mason contributed a rushing touchdown. Source: Official Eagles game statistics.
This article breaks down the player statistics, team performance, offensive and defensive highlights, and lessons from the game. It also explains which numbers matter most when evaluating future meetings between Philadelphia and Minnesota.
1. Eagles vs Vikings player stats Match Overview
The Philadelphia Eagles and Minnesota Vikings are two competitive NFC teams known for explosive offenses, physical defenses, and passionate fan bases. An Eagles vs Vikings match overview covers their head-to-head history, key players, offensive and defensive strengths, and the major factors that can influence the outcome of their next meeting.
The teams last met on October 19, 2025, when Philadelphia defeated Minnesota 28–22 at U.S. Bank Stadium. The 2026 NFL schedules currently do not list another regular-season meeting between the teams. NFL+
The final score tells only part of the story. Minnesota finished with 387 total net yards, compared with Philadelphia’s 361. The Vikings also recorded 21 first downs, while the Eagles had 13.
Despite those advantages, Minnesota could not turn its additional possessions and yardage into enough touchdowns. Philadelphia’s passing attack was more explosive, and its defense made two interceptions. One of those takeaways became a 42-yard touchdown return by linebacker Jalyx Hunt.
The Eagles also avoided interceptions on offense. That balance between productive passing and ball security helped them maintain the lead.
Minnesota remained competitive throughout the game. It scored in every quarter, including 10 points in the third quarter and six in the fourth. However, the Vikings’ offense did not record a passing touchdown, which limited its ability to keep pace with Philadelphia’s scoring.
The result highlights a fundamental NFL principle: gaining more yards does not always mean playing the more effective game. Turnovers, touchdown efficiency, explosive plays, and red-zone execution can outweigh advantages in possession time or first downs.
2. Jalen Hurts Player Stats
Jalen Hurts delivered one of the game’s most efficient performances. The Philadelphia quarterback completed 19 of 23 passes for 326 yards, three touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
His completion percentage was approximately 82.6%, and his official passer rating was 158.3. These numbers show how effectively he connected with his receivers and converted passing opportunities into points.
Jalen Hurts passing statistics
| Statistic | Result |
|---|---|
| Completions | 19 |
| Pass attempts | 23 |
| Completion percentage | 82.6% |
| Passing yards | 326 |
| Passing touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer rating | 158.3 |
Source: Official gamebook.
Hurts averaged approximately 14.2 yards per pass attempt, showing how Philadelphia created significant gains without needing a large number of throws. His longest completion covered 79 yards, and the passing game consistently created opportunities for the Eagles’ top receivers.
His touchdown passes were especially important. A.J. Brown caught two scoring passes, while DeVonta Smith added another. Rather than relying on repeated short gains, Philadelphia used explosive passing plays to put points on the board.
Hurts also attempted four rushes but finished with minus 10 rushing yards. This is an important detail for fantasy football analysis because his rushing production was limited in this particular game.
One strong performance should not be treated as a guarantee of future results. Quarterback production depends on protection, receiver availability, opponent coverage, game plans, and down-and-distance situations. Still, Hurts’ performance in this matchup showed the value of accuracy, explosive throws, and avoiding turnovers.
3. Carson Wentz Player Stats
Carson Wentz led Minnesota’s passing attack in the October 2025 meeting. He completed 26 of 42 attempts for 313 yards, with no passing touchdowns and two interceptions.
His passing yardage was substantial, but the lack of touchdown passes and the two turnovers made it harder for Minnesota to match Philadelphia’s scoring output.
Carson Wentz passing statistics
| Statistic | Result |
|---|---|
| Completions | 26 |
| Pass attempts | 42 |
| Completion percentage | 61.9% |
| Passing yards | 313 |
| Passing touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Passer rating | 64.9 |
Source: Pro-Football-Reference box score.
Wentz attempted 19 more passes than Hurts and completed seven more, but he did not produce a passing touchdown. Hurts, meanwhile, threw three touchdowns without an interception.
This difference illustrates why passing volume should not be confused with passing efficiency. A quarterback may accumulate substantial yardage because his team needs to throw frequently while trailing. That volume can increase passing totals, but it can also expose the offense to more pressure and turnover opportunities.
Wentz’s two interceptions were particularly costly because Philadelphia capitalized on its defensive opportunities. One interception led directly to a touchdown, creating a scoring advantage without requiring the Eagles’ offense to sustain a drive.
When evaluating quarterback performances, consider completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and the circumstances in which the statistics were recorded. Together, these figures provide a clearer picture than passing yards alone.
4. Rushing Stats: Saquon Barkley vs Jordan Mason
The rushing game was a contrast between the teams. Minnesota produced more rushing yards and a rushing touchdown, while Philadelphia relied heavily on its passing attack.
Philadelphia Eagles rushing stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saquon Barkley | 18 | 44 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Tank Bigsby | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Jalen Hurts | 4 | -10 | -2.5 | 0 |
| Team total | 23 | 45 | 2.0 | 0 |
Saquon Barkley led Philadelphia with 44 rushing yards on 18 carries. His average of 2.4 yards per attempt was modest, and he did not score a rushing touchdown.
Tank Bigsby had a more productive individual run, gaining 11 yards on his only rushing attempt. Hurts’ negative rushing total reduced the team’s overall average.
Philadelphia finished with 45 net rushing yards, so the ground game was not the primary reason for its victory. Instead, the Eagles’ ability to throw the ball efficiently allowed them to compensate for their limited rushing output.
Minnesota Vikings rushing stats
| Player | Carries | Rushing yards | Average | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Mason | 15 | 57 | 3.8 | 1 |
| Carson Wentz | 4 | 28 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Zavier Scott | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Team total | 23 | 89 | 3.9 | 1 |
Jordan Mason led Minnesota with 57 rushing yards and one touchdown on 15 attempts. His touchdown came on a one-yard run in the third quarter, helping the Vikings remain within reach.
Wentz also contributed 28 rushing yards, including a 16-yard run. Minnesota finished with 89 net rushing yards, nearly double Philadelphia’s total.
However, the Vikings’ better rushing numbers did not lead to victory. Their passing turnovers and lack of passing touchdowns offset some of the advantage they gained on the ground.
For a complete rushing analysis, look beyond total yards. Carries, yards per attempt, touchdowns, long runs, tackles for loss, and short-yardage success help explain how well a team used its ground game.
5. Receiving Stats: DeVonta Smith, A.J. Brown, and Justin Jefferson
The receiving matchup was one of the most important parts of the game. Philadelphia’s top two receivers combined for 304 receiving yards and three touchdowns, while Minnesota’s receivers gained yards but did not record a receiving touchdown in this contest.
Philadelphia Eagles receiving leaders
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Longest catch | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeVonta Smith | 9 | 183 | 79 yards | 1 |
| A.J. Brown | 4 | 121 | 45 yards | 2 |
| Dallas Goedert | 3 | 18 | 11 yards | 0 |
| Will Shipley | 1 | 7 | 7 yards | 0 |
DeVonta Smith was Philadelphia’s leading receiver, recording nine catches for 183 yards and one touchdown. His 79-yard touchdown reception was one of the defining plays of the afternoon.
Smith averaged 20.3 yards per catch, reflecting the impact of Philadelphia’s ability to create explosive passing opportunities. Long completions can quickly change field position and force a defense to adjust its coverage.
A.J. Brown added four receptions for 121 yards and two touchdowns. His average of more than 30 yards per catch highlights how effective Philadelphia was at attacking downfield.
Brown’s two scoring receptions were especially valuable because they turned passing production into points. When a defense focuses on one receiver, another talented target can benefit from additional space or a favorable matchup.
Dallas Goedert contributed three receptions for 18 yards. Although his yardage was limited, tight ends can still play important roles by helping quarterbacks on shorter routes and third-down situations.
Minnesota Vikings receiving leaders
| Player | Receptions | Receiving yards | Longest catch | TDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Addison | 9 | 128 | 34 yards | 0 |
| Justin Jefferson | 5 | 79 | 40 yards | 0 |
| T.J. Hockenson | 6 | 43 | 10 yards | 0 |
| Jalen Nailor | 2 | 37 | 26 yards | 0 |
| Adam Thielen | 1 | 10 | 10 yards | 0 |
Jordan Addison led Minnesota with nine catches for 128 yards. His production helped the Vikings move the ball through the air, even though he did not score a touchdown.
Justin Jefferson added five receptions for 79 yards, including a 40-yard catch. T.J. Hockenson recorded six catches for 43 yards, giving Wentz another target in the middle of the field.
The main difference was scoring efficiency. Philadelphia’s leading receivers produced three touchdowns between them, while Minnesota’s listed receiving leaders did not score.
For readers researching Eagles vs Vikings player stats, this distinction matters: receiving yards show how much ground a player gained through catches, but touchdowns reveal how often that production directly contributed to the scoreboard.
6. Defensive Performance and Turnovers
Philadelphia’s defense played a decisive role in the outcome. The Eagles intercepted Wentz twice and returned one interception for a touchdown.
Jalyx Hunt returned an interception 42 yards for a score in the second quarter. That play gave Philadelphia a 14–3 lead and forced Minnesota to work from behind.
Andrew Mukuba recorded the other interception. Both takeaways helped Philadelphia finish the game with zero interceptions thrown and two interceptions gained on defense.
Minnesota’s defense faced a difficult challenge against Hurts. Philadelphia completed 19 of 23 passes, and its top receivers repeatedly gained significant yardage. The Vikings struggled to prevent the Eagles from converting those opportunities into touchdowns.
Several defensive statistics are useful when assessing a matchup:
- Interceptions: Show how often defenders take possession away from the offense.
- Sacks: Measure plays in which a quarterback is brought down behind the line while attempting to pass.
- Quarterback pressures: Reveal disruption that may not result in a sack.
- Tackles for loss: Show how often a defense stops a play behind the line of scrimmage.
- Third-down stops: Indicate whether a defense can end drives.
- Red-zone defense: Measures how effectively a team limits scoring opportunities near the goal line.
Turnovers are often game-changing events, but they can be difficult to predict from one week to the next. For a reliable evaluation, combine turnover results with repeatable factors such as pressure, tackling, coverage, and communication.
7. Complete Team Statistics Comparison
The team numbers reveal why Minnesota’s yardage advantage did not result in a win. The Vikings controlled the ball for longer and earned more first downs, but Philadelphia created more explosive passing plays and scored through both its offense and defense.
| Team statistic | Eagles | Vikings |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 28 | 22 |
| Total net yards | 361 | 387 |
| Net passing yards | 316 | 298 |
| Net rushing yards | 45 | 89 |
| First downs | 13 | 21 |
| Third-down conversions | 3 of 10 | 7 of 15 |
| Interceptions thrown | 0 | 2 |
| Passing touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Rushing touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Time of possession | 25:58 | 34:02 |
| Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
Source: Official NFL gamebook.
Minnesota gained 26 more total yards and held the ball for more than eight additional minutes. It also converted more third downs. Ordinarily, those advantages help an offense create scoring opportunities.
Philadelphia, however, gained more net passing yards and averaged 7.4 yards per offensive play, compared with Minnesota’s 5.8. The Eagles also recorded four total touchdowns, including the defensive score, while the Vikings scored one offensive touchdown and five field goals.
The red-zone numbers are especially revealing. Philadelphia did not score an offensive touchdown on its recorded red-zone opportunity, but it generated touchdowns through explosive passing plays from outside the red zone and a defensive interception return. Minnesota’s red-zone results were less productive, with just one touchdown in six recorded trips.
This is why team statistics should be read together. Total yards, possession, and first downs explain how a team moved the ball. Turnovers, explosive plays, and touchdown efficiency help explain why it won or lost.
8. What Decided the Eagles vs Vikings player stats?
Four factors stand out from the October 2025 matchup.
Efficient passing
Hurts completed more than 82% of his passes and threw three touchdowns. Philadelphia gained significant yardage through Smith and Brown, allowing the offense to score without needing a high number of rushing yards.
Defensive touchdown
Hunt’s interception return gave the Eagles seven points and changed the game’s momentum. A defensive touchdown is particularly valuable because it adds points without requiring the offense to complete a drive.
Minnesota’s turnovers
Wentz threw two interceptions, and Philadelphia took advantage. Minnesota moved the ball but gave the Eagles additional opportunities to score and maintain their lead.
Touchdown conversion
Minnesota gained more total yards, but Philadelphia produced more touchdowns. The Vikings’ five field goals kept them in the game, yet the difference between field goals and touchdowns ultimately mattered.
Together, these factors demonstrate that efficient execution can outweigh a statistical advantage in possession or total yardage.
9. Fantasy Football Takeaways
Fantasy football managers can use this matchup to understand why role, volume, and touchdown production matter.
- Jalen Hurts: His 326 passing yards and three passing touchdowns provided excellent quarterback production, although his rushing output was negative in this game.
- DeVonta Smith: Nine receptions, 183 yards, and one touchdown made him a standout receiver.
- A.J. Brown: His 121 yards and two touchdowns demonstrated the value of explosive plays and red-zone opportunities.
- Saquon Barkley: His 44 rushing yards and lack of a rushing touchdown limited his production, showing that a strong reputation does not guarantee a big fantasy score every week.
- Jordan Addison: His 128 receiving yards gave him a productive receiving day even without a touchdown.
- Justin Jefferson: His 79 yards showed that a receiver can contribute through yardage even when he does not find the end zone.
- Jordan Mason: His 57 rushing yards and touchdown offered value to fantasy managers in formats that reward rushing production.
Before setting a lineup, check current injury reports, expected player roles, recent usage, and opponent matchups. Statistics from one past game can provide context, but they should not be treated as guaranteed predictions for a future contest.
10. Where to Find Official NFL Player Stats
Readers looking for accurate game information should use official team pages, NFL gamebooks, and established statistical databases.
The Philadelphia Eagles official game page includes the final score and individual player statistics. The official NFL gamebook provides detailed passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, and team numbers. Pro-Football-Reference is another useful resource for historical box scores and game summaries.
When publishing or comparing player statistics, always verify the game date. Passing yards should not be confused with total offensive yards, and individual rushing totals should not be presented as team rushing totals.
For future matchups, separate completed-game statistics from predictions. Current rosters, injuries, coaching changes, and recent performance can significantly affect the expected result.
11. Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Eagles vs Vikings player stats game on October 19, 2025?
The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Minnesota Vikings 28–22 at U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis.
How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts record?
Hurts completed 19 of 23 passes for 326 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions.
How did Carson Wentz perform?
Wentz completed 26 of 42 passes for 313 yards. He threw no passing touchdowns and was intercepted twice.
Who led the Eagles in receiving yards?
DeVonta Smith led Philadelphia with nine receptions for 183 yards and one touchdown. A.J. Brown recorded 121 yards and two touchdown catches.
Who was Minnesota’s leading receiver?
Jordan Addison led the Vikings with nine catches for 128 yards. Justin Jefferson finished with five receptions for 79 yards.
Which team gained more total yards?
Minnesota gained 387 total net yards, compared with Philadelphia’s 361. Despite the yardage advantage, the Vikings lost because Philadelphia converted its opportunities more effectively and benefited from defensive turnovers.
Where can I find the full player box score?
The Eagles’ official game page and the NFL gamebook provide the full box score for the October 19, 2025, matchup, including quarterback, running back, receiver, and team statistics.
Conclusion
The October 19, 2025, matchup between Philadelphia and Minnesota showed that winning football is about more than accumulating yards. The Vikings gained more total yardage, recorded more first downs, and controlled possession for longer. Philadelphia nevertheless secured a 28–22 victory through efficient quarterback play, explosive receiving performances, and a defense that converted an interception into a touchdown.
The biggest individual performances included Hurts’ 326 passing yards and three touchdowns, Smith’s 183 receiving yards, Brown’s two touchdown catches, Addison’s 128 receiving yards, and Mason’s rushing touchdown.
For fans following Eagles vs Vikings player stats, the most useful approach is to compare quarterback efficiency, rushing production, receiving numbers, turnovers, and red-zone execution together. These statistics explain not only what happened during a game but also which areas may deserve attention in future matchups. Always use the official box score for confirmed results and current team information for any new preview.
Hobby & Animal Names
Leo Hartman has owned dogs, birds, and one very difficult goat. He writes the hobby and animal names content here. Before any name makes the list, he tries it out loud first, usually on his dog, to see if it actually sounds right.